Formula & ingredient review
We review medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients, amounts, ingredient forms and the proposed daily serving. Questions are raised early, while changes are still practical.

A clear path from your product idea to a well-prepared application. Kompete supports Class I, II and III NPN submissions, formula review, scientific evidence and Canadian labelling.
A complete, consistent first filing helps reduce avoidable questions and rework. Your formula, intended benefits and supporting records need to tell the same story. It cannot reserve an approval date or bypass Health Canada’s review queue.
Our NPN consulting work brings formulation and regulatory review together. We help you understand what can move forward, what needs clarification and where further work is needed before filing.
For established brands, that may mean adapting an overseas product. For a new launch, it may mean resolving an ingredient or claim question before committing to production. Plan preparation time and regulator review separately, and allow for outstanding technical questions.

The useful estimate is the one built around your product. We separate the work needed to prepare a submission from the regulator’s review.
| Application | Review standard* | Typical preparation focus | Kompete fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | 60 calendar days | Exact single-monograph fit | Request a scoped quote |
| Class II | 90 calendar days | Permitted monograph combinations and wording | Request a scoped quote |
| Class III | 210 calendar days | Product-specific evidence and technical gaps | Request a scoped quote |
*Published standards, not a prediction of your approval date. Queue conditions, the applicable assessment route and information requests can affect elapsed time. Preparation comes before regulatory review; certain joint Class III assessments fall outside the usual standard.
View official service standards ↗No. Our role is to improve the application and resolve technical gaps, not to promise priority. Health Canada reports that prioritized applications exceed review capacity. For applications received on or after 15 December 2025, review order follows receipt date. Earlier files follow workload-management prioritization-form dates, with receipt date breaking ties.
Health Canada source ↗Health Canada says implementation did not proceed on the proposed 1 December 2025 date and will be revisited after program adjustments. Do not use the proposed fee tables as current charges. Consulting, testing and other project costs remain separate. Your proposal should distinguish our professional fees from external testing, translation and other separately scoped work.
Health Canada source ↗Request a written proposal with deliverables, responsibilities and exclusions. Testing, translation and other third-party work should be identified separately where applicable.
Service standards are not guaranteed approval dates. Some complex Class III files involving joint assessment fall outside the usual standard. We discuss the applicable route and planning assumptions with you.
Bring your concept, proposed ingredients and intended benefits. We review the regulatory direction alongside the formulation so you can identify evidence gaps before investing in packaging or production.
The scope is agreed around your product and existing documentation. You can engage us for a targeted review or a broader application project.
We review medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients, amounts, ingredient forms and the proposed daily serving. Questions are raised early, while changes are still practical.
We assess whether the proposed benefits are supported and relevant to the actual ingredient, dose and intended user. Where evidence is incomplete, we identify the gap and discuss options.
We bring the agreed product information into a coordinated application package, with supporting documentation and applicant details reviewed for consistency.
We review Canadian label requirements and identify where English and French content needs attention. Translation and bilingual review responsibilities are confirmed in the proposal.
We help interpret information requests, organize the response and resolve inconsistencies between the submission, supporting evidence and manufacturer records.
We support the handoff from application to launch planning, including related testing, manufacturing and import questions, plus subsequent licence changes as agreed.
The application class depends on how the product fits Health Canada’s monographs and the assessment required. A familiar ingredient does not automatically mean a straightforward application.
Products that meet all the parameters of one applicable monograph. Exact alignment matters, including the recommended conditions of use.
Applications meeting the Class II criteria, including suitable combinations of monographs and certain permitted minor wording deviations. Compatibility still needs review.
Products outside Class I and II criteria. Ingredient, claim, dose, delivery or combination questions may require additional safety, efficacy or quality assessment.
These summaries are a starting point, not an automatic classification tool. We assess the complete product and current guidance before recommending a filing route.
Answer four questions using information you have already verified. This questionnaire uses your selections; it does not search NHPID, analyse ingredients or determine regulatory eligibility.
Educational guidance only, not a regulatory opinion or an approval prediction. Answers stay in this page’s memory and are not submitted. Discuss the result with us before making filing decisions.
Classification depends on the complete product, including ingredients, presentation, intended use and claims. A powder, gummy or pouch is a format, not a regulatory classification. A foreign product category does not automatically carry over to Canada.
| Framework | What to establish | What not to assume |
|---|---|---|
| NHP / NPN | Eligibility under the NHP framework and an appropriate product licence application. | A natural ingredient or a competitor NPN does not authorize your product. |
| Homeopathic / DIN-HM | The applicable homeopathic product pathway. | DIN-HM is not interchangeable with an ordinary NPN or DIN. |
| Other drugs / DIN | The relevant drug authorization route, evidence and prescription status. | NHPs are also drugs under the Act, but have their own regulatory framework. |
| Food / supplemented food | Food classification, permitted ingredients and applicable food labelling and claims. | A food-format product does not necessarily belong on an NPN application. |
Use these updates as planning checkpoints. Effective requirements, consultation drafts and transition announcements are identified separately. Each source below was checked on 12 October 2026; revisit it before a filing or packaging decision.
Health Canada reports that prioritized applications exceed review capacity. For applications received on or after 15 December 2025, review order follows receipt date. Earlier files follow workload-management prioritization-form dates, with receipt date breaking ties.
Health Canada source ↗Review quality procedures and supplier records against GUI-0158 version 4. GMP responsibilities and the activities requiring a site licence should be assessed separately; not every business in the distribution chain needs the same licence.
Health Canada source ↗Current labelling guidance identifies this date following the exemption order. Further regulatory amendments are being developed. Plan bilingual artwork and Product Facts Table requirements using the guidance in force, and recheck before printing.
Health Canada source ↗The consultation page still describes a draft revised guide and says a final version is intended later in 2026. The end of consultation does not make the draft effective. Use current requirements while assessing potential changes.
Health Canada source ↗The notice covers sports electrolyte products presented as foods. New products must meet the food framework. Oral rehydration solutions for diarrhea or vomiting are excluded; products with both ORS and sports claims need a positioning decision.
Health Canada source ↗Health Canada says implementation did not proceed on the proposed 1 December 2025 date and will be revisited after program adjustments. Do not use the proposed fee tables as current charges. Consulting, testing and other project costs remain separate.
Health Canada source ↗Pouches delivering 4 mg or less remain non-prescription products regulated as NHPs; those delivering more than 4 mg are prescription drugs. Ingredient amount alone does not authorize a product, claim or sales channel.
Health Canada source ↗We examine whether your evidence is relevant to the ingredient form, daily dose, intended population and proposed benefit. A study on a different extract or serving size may leave a gap that marketing language cannot solve.
Our review can identify the need for supplier clarification, a narrower claim, further literature work or a revised development plan. Proposed changes are discussed with you before being incorporated into the project.
Explore claims substantiation →
We review the relationship between the product information and the proposed label: ingredients, directions, intended benefits, risk statements and applicable bilingual requirements.
Artwork review also considers the practical package—available space, legibility and the presentation of required information. Changes should be resolved before the final print run.
Health Canada’s published guidance identifies June 22, 2028 as the compliance date following the exemption order. A May 2026 bulletin also confirms ongoing work on further amendments and transition planning. Confirm the requirements in force when approving artwork rather than treating a proposed future change as final.
Read the official transition update ↗Review the Canadian formula, intended use and label. Define the applicant and licence-holder arrangements, including Canadian contact requirements where applicable.
Confirm a properly licensed Canadian importer and the relevant foreign-site quality evidence. Product licensing and site licensing solve different requirements.
Align specifications, testing, bilingual artwork, distribution records and recall responsibilities. Confirm partner roles in writing, including who maintains each set of records.
An Information Request asks for clarification or additional material; it is not the same as a refusal. Begin with the actual notice, the response deadline and the full submitted package. We help identify what is missing, reconcile the evidence and scope the response.
The complete notice, deadline, submitted application, supporting evidence, relevant supplier records and previous correspondence. Identify who is authorized to communicate with Health Canada. Confirm a secure way to share confidential documents before sending them.
Tell us immediately. Work to the deadline in the notice. Any extension depends on the applicable process and Health Canada’s decision; engaging a consultant does not extend it automatically.
Review the decision and reasons before choosing reconsideration, a revised submission or a different product strategy. These are distinct options with their own criteria and deadlines; a standard IR response may not be appropriate.
Canadian manufacturing, packaging, labelling and importing activities require the appropriate site licence. We help clarify the roles in your proposed supply chain and identify the records to obtain.
We can review finished-product specifications and discuss identity, potency, contamination and stability testing needs with your manufacturer or laboratory. The plan must fit the product.
Coordinate the licensed product, final artwork, production records and distribution plan. An NPN is not a substitute for meeting the other requirements that apply to your business and sales channels.
You do not need a perfect dossier to start. Send what you have and identify what is missing. That lets us scope the next step around the actual project.
For an existing application, include the complete submitted package and correspondence, not just the most recent reviewer question.
This checklist is for your preparation only. It does not upload documents or assess regulatory readiness. Selections reset when the page reloads.
0 of 7 items gathered

An anonymized project involving NPN application work for a nutrition powder intended for use around surgery. Explore the formulation and evidence considerations behind the application.
Review your product, available records and intended market positioning. Identify the issues that matter before committing to the full application scope.
Develop the agreed documentation and resolve outstanding questions with you and relevant suppliers. Confirm the package before submission.
Support filing and responses within the agreed scope, then coordinate the documentation needed for your next stage and future changes.
Our approach connects ingredient and formulation questions with claims, evidence, manufacturing information and launch planning. The aim is a practical submission strategy that your technical team can implement, with a clear scope and decisions documented along the way.
Address dose, ingredient form, sensory constraints and intended use together, so a regulatory recommendation remains practical to manufacture.
Understand which questions can be answered from existing records and where further scientific or quality work is needed.
Keep the application, label, manufacturer information and subsequent changes aligned. Confirm responsibilities instead of leaving gaps between suppliers.
NHP describes the product category: a natural health product. An NPN is the product licence number assigned by Health Canada to an authorized NHP. Homeopathic products use a DIN-HM. An application in progress is not an issued licence.
We can assess the likely route from the full formula, ingredient forms, dose, claims and intended users. A short ingredient list alone is rarely enough. Our assessment supports planning; Health Canada makes the regulatory decision.
We scope the work after reviewing the product and available documentation. Cost depends on application complexity, evidence work, formula readiness, label support and the number of products. Ask for a written scope that separates consulting work from laboratory testing, translation, supplier work and any applicable external charges.
There are two timelines: preparing a complete submission and Health Canada reviewing it. Missing supplier records, evidence gaps and formula changes affect preparation. Review time depends on the application and applicable service standards. We agree preparation milestones after the initial review rather than promise an approval date.
Yes. We can review the scientific rationale, proposed use and supporting records, identify gaps and plan the application work. An ingredient being novel does not mean that a claim will be accepted. Some projects need additional evidence, a different claim or formulation changes before submission is practical.
We review it as a starting document and identify what needs to change for the Canadian product. Ingredient presentation, claims, directions, risk wording and bilingual information should be assessed together. Overseas sales history does not replace Canadian product authorization.
We can help define testing needs, coordinate third-party laboratory discussions and review available specifications and reports within the project scope. Laboratory fees and testing timelines are separate from application preparation unless expressly included in the proposal.
A product licence and a site licence serve different purposes. Canadian businesses manufacturing, packaging, labelling or importing NHPs for sale require the appropriate site licence. Your business activities and supply chain determine what applies; the NPN alone does not cover these activities.
Yes. We can assess your product for the Canadian market and help organize the application and local supply-chain requirements. We clarify applicant responsibilities, Canadian representation where applicable, and the licensed importing arrangement as part of the project.
We can review the file and discuss a defined handover. Start with the complete submission, correspondence, reference numbers and any deadline. Access and authorization must be arranged before we act on the file.
Submitting an application does not authorize sale. An NHP needs the applicable product licence before legal sale in Canada. The commercial launch also needs an appropriate manufacturing, import and labelling arrangement.
That is a useful time to start. We can connect the intended claims and regulatory route with formulation development, then identify the technical information a future manufacturing partner will need.
Tell us what you are developing, where the project stands and what you need help resolving. We can start with a focused review and define the work from there.
Book a consultationOfficial sources checked October 12, 2026. Requirements can change. This page provides general information, not a product-specific regulatory opinion. Application outcomes remain subject to Health Canada’s review.